Wednesday, October 30, 2013

INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW

Straight out of the ComBox we will move gayly (I hate the misappropriation of that word) forward to find the answer.

Readerette submits this Dubium:

It is asked: Whether whilst His Reverence was in the Eternal City, there was occasioned a meeting with Vincent Apicella, Bishop-Ostrich of Velletri-Segni, Robert Morlino, Bishop-Weasel of Madison (by contretemps also in Rome then), and the gourmet mendicant, ostensibly to discuss employment arrangements?


For those unable or unwilling to read and or mentally digest sarcasm and/or snark, WDTPRDAD will provide a slavishly accurate transliteration  of said Dubium.

When that big dork Zuhlsdorf was hanging out in Rome at the expense of the hardworking people he has tricked in to donating to him was there a  sit down with said dork and his current bishop from the burbs of Rome and the uber-tight sphinctered bishop of the place where Z actually LIVES and WORKS to talk about giving the presbyterial beggar an actual parochial/diocesan assignment where he will have to answer to an actual supervisor on a regular basis??

Not being privy to such into I'll open the ComBox and my MAIL BOX for your reasonably accurate information, or even basic speculation. Bring it on... 
Have at it....
Let 'er rip....

17 comments:

  1. Since he is such a foodie, I think that I have the perfect job for him... Papal food taster. Of course, Francis doesn't eat at the best tratorrias in Rome. ;)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Meh... Nah.. would keep him in too close proximity to those in power and influence. He would also be in close proximity to all the cafes and gelato vendors, tratorrias and osterias.

      Besides, other than the folkz at Rorate Coeli and the SSPX, who would want to poison this pope?!?

      Delete
  2. Readerette here. You made me laugh slavishly transliterating my snark. But I guess I miss the connection to the gaiety. (Oh, how I am just fine with the appropriation of that word.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am glad I could assist in your laughter. A few studies state that the biological effects of laughter results in the release certain chemicals in the body that promote general good health.

      Zzzzz is the one that thinks the word "gay" has become misappropriated, probably by "libtards" like me.

      Peace and all goodness to you and yours!

      Delete
  3. ha, the gourmet mendicant! speaking of which today he's getting his eastern rite cuisine on in NYC

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would be lying if I told you I am not a little jealous of that lunch.

      Delete
  4. Remember how on cold winter nights, Fr ZZ (is he ZZ Top or ZZ Bottom?) used to "like to send out for a little spicy Vietnamese?" Shades of the tequila-soaked proprietor of PaxHouse Tat Shop, Campesino Warehouse and Stray Dog Kennel down in Guadalajara!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You know what they say about the uptight control freaks? They're all bottoms.

      Delete
    2. Your a pervert.

      Delete
  5. Really, this is atrocious. I take issue with aspects of Fr Zuhlsdorf's personality, but I don't have to take his character. No one does. This isn't the subtle use of irony, this is the red tooth and claw of vendetta. There is nothing good going on here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Father D, you allow your readers too much freedom. Free thought, free speech, free expression. Your probably prochoice as well I bet.
      Your implications that Father Z is a homosexual or struggling with same sex attractions is a fowl ball. His personality and his character are far better than yours.

      Delete
    2. Not really sure what you are (YOU'RE) referencing. Maybe gather YOUR (those belonging to you) thoughts, and get back to me. Hmmmmkay?

      Delete
    3. I want to see the page where this post was linked, and the Zzzzzeros were asked to defend there [sic] Zzzzed.

      Delete
    4. I'd like to see the site that has asked the Zzzeroes to come to the defense of there (sic) Fr Zzz.

      Delete
    5. Oh really? I am sure that if this page was linked somewhere and if anyone asked the Zzzzombies to defend "Super Z" that the Reverend Father has nothing at all to do with it. He has told a couple associates that 1) if he ignores me, I will get frustrated and go away. 2) If this blog (Fr D's) brings one new reader (donation) per month, then its existence is justified.

      Delete
  6. Doesn't it worry you that people are using your comments box to off-load coarse unverifiable claims against someone? It should, not least for legal reasons.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If it were the case, I would be concerned. However, after review of the last few post with the most comments, your above stated concern is not the case at all. Nowhere has anyone off loaded "coarse unverifiable claims" against anyone. Maybe I iz just an ignunt maroon, but I ain't not seen it. However you are free to send any specific comments and the URL of the original post to fatherjtd(AT)gmail(DOT)com

      I support free speech in theory and in action. Period. There are a few basic rules concerning online behavior.

      Legal reasons? Is someone going to sue me? I don't have recurring contributors giving me up and above of five grand per month. The item of the most significant value that I own is a new cassock ($200.00 US) and some old books that I was saving for retirement. The books are now all but worthless due to the shabby reprint on demand.

      Delete